Would the Founders of the Founding Documents of the Constitution and Birth Of A New People Of The United States Of America Condone Unlimited Abortions?
Several days back, I read a social media political post of the following expressions:
* The Founders wrote the [ Constitution]– not the [ Apostles] ;
* The Founders added the [ Bill Of Rights]–not the [ Ten Commandments];
* The Founders [ Intent was Freedom Of Religion]– not control by Religion;
* The Founders created a [ Society Of Freedom/ Democracy]– Not a Land Of Righteous Morality ( Theocracy). Emphasis Added.
However, The U.S. Supreme Court In Determining it’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, looked to religious aspects-[ of the different religious views on when ” Life Begins” of the Jewish Faith and Catholic Faith]- in search of guidance, in an effort of seeking Governmental and Societal Balance, with respect to the issue of abortion— Nonetheless, I will turn to two Founding Documents ( in relevant part) in support of my perspective with respect to the issue of Abortion within our National Society — “But before I do, please allow me to tell my story for my ultimate political position.”
It begins with the realization that I didn’t come to know my ” Birth-Mother” until I was Twelve-Years-Of -Age. But, on the Saturday evening in 2016 -( Three days before my Birth-Mother passed away, on the following Tuesday)- my Mother shared communication with me of her life, that she obviously wanted to leave within [ my awareness] Of beingness for the duration of this thing that we call life. Y’all see, my Mother told me ( of many different aspects of her life) in an implied sense, that she really did not want to bring me forth from her womb into this thing of life, because of anger towards my Father’s physical, mental and emotional Abuses of which he Inflicted upon her. Abuses that she said continued even after he had knowlege of my Spark of life in her. Of which brought her to the thinking and Sincere desire to terminate my spark of life. But my Midwife Mrs. Marie Davenport Of Wagoner S.C. ( I got a chance to meet her in her late 90 something years of age, and I heard her ask my mother where was my Baby), I didn’t Know the significance of Mrs. Davenport’s statement then, but after my Birth-Mother’s confession, it was obvious that Mrs Davenport Gave My Birth-Mother The Needed Dedication, Determination And Mindial And Emotional Self-Discipline to bring me forth out of her womb— Yes, my Birth-Mother did what was right, and allowed me To experience my gift of life, yes the freedom of my life and the opportunity to pursue it in happiness of the things of what is of creation, and I’m Thankful! thus I have had the opportunity to share with each and everyone of you. This is my belief and knowing that all lives matter!
The Significance Of The Initial Constitutional Impact On Society In The Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe V. Wade Decision.
Many Citizens-Residents Within the Territorial Boundaries Of The United States Of America are of the belief that the U.S. Supreme Court 1973 decision sealed the 14th Amendment Legality of Abortions under the Constitution Of The United States. However, a closer review of the 14th Amendment Clauses shows contrary to the Court’s Initial 1973 decision.
The Constitutional Content Language Expressions Of The 14th Amendment provides( In Relevant Part):
” …. No [State] Shall Abridge( or, Infringe upon) the privileges or immunities of Ctizens of The United States ; Nor shall any [ State] deprive any person of [ Life] without [ Due Process Of Law] ; Nor deny any person within it’s Jurisdiction the [ Equal Protection Of The Laws]. ” Compare: [ Section 1 of the 14th Amendment Of The Constitution]. emphasis Added.
Nowhere, in the [clause] Of the 14th Amendment that it can be implied that the [Intention] of the Founding drafters and framers of the 14th Amendment was of the Inclusion of [ Privacy Rights]– Of which the 1973 Supreme Court used as the Governmental and Societal Balancing affect regarding the our National Abortion issue.
In Realization, not one clause of the 14th Amendment explicitly express of [ Privacy Rights]– Therefore, there maybe a potential question of whether Abortions are Constitutionally Legal under the 14th Amendment with respect to Privacy Rights as initially determined in the Court’s 1973 decision.
I would like to bring to each and everyone of our rememberance— That within the Territorial Boundaries Of our Great Nation, that we’re governed by the [ Rule Of Law]:
” And that the [ Constitution] Of our Nation is the Supreme Law Of The Land !”
Fear Not, The Potential Of The U.S. Supreme Court Overturning Roe V. Wade.
The reason of my asking to ” Fear Not” the Court’s Overturning of the [ initial determing reasons] in of the 1973 decision– is because I’m of the perspective that any potential principles of reasons will nevertheless establish broader 14th Amendment guide post implications for reasoning in the Balance of Power, and progression in Fairness Of Equality within society, Given the initial questions presented by State Governments in the 1973 Decision :
* States have the interest of Safeguarding health, maintaining medical standards and protecting life ( in this case prenatal) ;
* A Fetus [ Life in my reasoning] is a person protected by the 14th Amendment;
* Protecting Life [ prenatal of the states contention] is of a compelling State interest. Emphasis Added ( Go check the initial questions present by the states in 1973 for yourselves).
moreover, In The potential decision of the Court, the Question of Neccessity–[ What Constitute A Person For Constitutional Purposes]– Bypassed of the 1973 Court Should Reasoned and answered.
In Conclusion Of The Issue Regarding of what is a person for Constitutional Purposes I’m Of The Perspective That the answer is Found In Declaration Of Independence.
I now turn to my perspective of the Document of which stands for the ” Birth Of A People Bestowed of Creator given Unalienable Rights Of self- Sovereignty, individuality of state of beingness, life, Freedom and the pursuit of happiness in their new found state of beingness — of which the [ Declaration Of Independence] Of the Second Continental Congress Of The United States Of America, Stands for.
A National Governmental Document Of which both Content Language Expressions recognizes A Creator, Rights of the Creator which cannot be taken away, and of which is principled in Fairness Of Equality— Of which from my perspective, is of the guidance as to what is meant of the Alphabetically Arranged Term [ Person] for 14th Amendment Constitutional Purposes.
This is because of the following content language Expressions Of The Declaration Of Independence which provides( in relevant part) :
” We Hold These [ truths] to be [ self-evident], That all men are created equally, that [ they are endowed] by [ their creator], with [ Certain Unalienable Rights], that among these Unalienable Rights, are [ Life ], [ Freedom] and [ The pursuit of happiness].” Compare: [ Paragraph two]. emphasis Added.
It Is in these Aforementioned principled Unalienable Rights that may be found Of guidance for the defining of a person.
I take this point of view because the expression “all men” in my opinion can be viewed as all persons of an individual state of beingness ( or, Grouped of many different individual states of beingness, of which are created of the Creator essence of equality of state of beingness– that is strictly observed as the first Unalienable right Bestowed of the creator–[ Life]. it is my view therefore, a [Person] for the Constitutional purpose is one of an “ Individual State Of Beingness Of Life”.
Thus I ask, Could it not be, the moral responsibility of such equally created Human individual states of beingness of a Spark of life, to recognize the spark of life of a ” Heartbeat”, as of equal, of individual state of beingness– with the same Creator given Unalienable Rights Of [ life[ [ freedom of Life] and allowed to [pursue happiness] in this thing that we call life ?
Sincerely And Respectfully